My thoughts as I read “Left Wing Jesus” by Rev. Rich Lang:
“Left Wing Jesus?”
“Left Wing” and “Right Wing” came into our vocabulary from just before the French Revolution in the late 18th Century. The National Assembly in Paris was divided into supporters of King Louis XVI and the “Ancient Regime,” men who sat to the president’s right. The supporters of the revolution were thus forced to sit to on the left. The Catholic Church supported the status quo and the Divine Right of Kings. The Deists and Protestants supported the French Revolution.
“Right Wing” has thus taken on “conservative” and “support the old system” and “back the elites of power and wealth” associations. Those people honestly believe we already have the system that’s best for everyone and it should not be changed.
“Left wing” as taken on “liberal” and “enlightened” and “back the people against economic oppression” connotations. Those people honestly believe that our system is corrupt and unjust and that things need to change.
American Political terms
The groups considered to be “Right Wing” are Fascists, Capitalists, Conservatives (both social and fiscal), Nationalists, Neoconservatives, Neoliberals, Reactionaries, Imperialists, Monarchists Libertarians, Authoritarians, and Religious Fundamentalists. These tend to gravitate into the Republican Party.
The “Left Wing” includes Anarchists, Communists, Socialists, Religious Progressives, Populists, Democratic Socialists, Social Liberals, and Green Party / Ecological Conservationists. These tend to associate with the Democratic Party.
Oddly, Conservationists are considered “Left Wing” but they are trying to conserve the planet. To do that they must challenge the political and economic system, thus leftists. Libertarians self-associate with the “Right Wing” even though they espouse Anarchy. They are Anarchists who have read Ayn Rand so want to be called Conservatives (they’re not), thus righties.
Economic terms like “Fascism” (big businesses and the wealthy run the government) or “Communism” (the workers own the means of production) are often misused, a legacy of World War II’s propaganda. Any of these positions can devolve into Totalitarianism due to Fundamentalist thinking (being sure you are the only one who has things perfectly correct and it’s your duty to force it on everyone and that those who oppose you are evil).
“Who Was Jesus?” How do we read the Bible and try to understand the answers given (always politically charged) by the authors and translators and scholars over the centuries to that question? Would Jesus sit on the Right or the Left in the French Assembly?
My pastor gave me an essay entitled “Left Wing Jesus” by Rev. Rich Lang. I’ve read it 1.5 times now. I wish he didn’t use the term “Fascist” in this context. Overall, I think he’s saying that we need to respect each other and value both “Right Wing” and “Left Wing” views of Jesus.
He’s up against Fundamentalism and “Right Wing Jesus” however. He should know about that imbalance of power. He’s the clergyman who stood with the Occupy Seattle folks and ended up getting pepper sprayed. His gentle words and thoughts, alone, are not going to rescue Coexist Jesus, no matter how important he is to the world we all occupy together.
Before September 2001, Americans mostly ignored the Taliban. A few noticed when they blew up two colossal statues of the Buddha in Bamiyan province, but otherwise we used them to weaken the Soviet Union.
There’s a similar religious organization in the US. The destruction of religious and cultural objects is one aspect of its agenda called “strategic level spiritual warfare” (SLSW).
The German theologian, Karl Barth, first declared “the church is always to be reformed” in 1947, but the idea goes back to the great Reformers; The Wesleys in the middle 1700s… Luther and others in the 1500s following the availability of printed Bibles. I, too, believe the Church needs to be constantly reforming itself back to First Principles and constantly adjusting itself to the dynamic world. Semper Reformanda Est.
Weather news is always followed by clear examples of the human need to pretend we know cause-and-effect. Some decry Global Climate Disruption. Some preach a modern version of Ba’al who punishes nations with storms if they don’t conform to ancient moral standards. Some point a distrusting finger at Government, the military, or blame the greedy for paving Paradise to put up a parking lot.
Moses didn’t make it to the Promised Land and his ideas didn’t work after Joshua conquered the place. Judges were needed and kings were demanded. Israel understood YHWH as their God, one of many in the world. Some people covered their bases and also joined neighbors and families to call for Ba’al to come in the Spring with his rains or attended parties to Astarte or El or others.
Read these marks right-to-left. They are consonants from early Hebrew. They didn’t write down vowel sounds, not even the later invention of “points.” These consonants might sound like Yahweh or Jehovah or Yehova. Jews were and are forbidden to say it aloud. We’re told that is out of respect.
History doesn’t support that theory, nor does the often stated translation as “I Am.”
The ancients had a literary form and a language for it we call Apocryphal. Sadly, we’ve lost the skeleton key to decode that language and that literary form. I wish we could discover the actual deeper levels of meaning, too.
The first three chapters of the Revelation of St. John seem to me a little Gnostic, but are otherwise pretty clear. John writes to Seven early Christian communes. People have tried to read something into that: are they seven real communities, seven stages all churches go through, seven eras of history, seven levels of personal faith journeys, or something else? Continue reading
The powerful female lead is Brünnhilde (Burning Hella). She’s based on the Norse mythology that gave us Beauty (Bella) in Beauty and the Beast, is Peter Pan’s Tinkerbelle friend, Cinder-Hella reduced to cleaning ashes and hoping to get the attention of Prince Mankind, and her soul-recycling volcano fire gave us the Medieval Catholic concept of “Hell.”
Habakkuk is three documents, written at different times and places. Most of chapter 1 was written by a young Habakkuk in Jerusalem, observing the armies of the north sweeping across the countryside, destroying, thieving, claiming other’s wealth and lives, and yet reaffirming that God’s plan was afoot. Chapter 2 records Five Woes spoken by an older Habakkuk from his new home in Assyria, speaking against those who build mansions on a hill, isolate themselves from community, amass wealth and power by squashing others, ruin the forests, kill the animals and do violence to the earth. He reminds us that such behaviors are self-defeating activities, mansions that are caskets, destruction that will come around to hurt the destroyers. Chapter 2 ends with a screed against idol worship and a promise.